OmniTrader Professional Forum OmniTrader Professional Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Jeff Brown

Member
25
Posts: 31

Joined: 1/29/2008

User Profile
 
Subject : RE: ATM Micro States Method
Posted : 3/5/2018 6:07 PM
Post #29924 - In reply to #29923

Jim, thanks for the suggestion.

The interesting results, running with iif( C = 0, 0, ATR(4)/C ) produced poor results. Final Equity around $350k vs $700k.

Getting rid of the iif and only having the ATR(4)/C, the results return closer to the expected value although it was still not equal. $677k vs $700k. So, close.

I then added the SMA function: SMA(ATR(4)/C, 1) and got the same result: $677k vs $700k.

Changing the smoothing number from 1 to 2 caused the final equity to end up at $640k.

So, the logic from the OL VTY_PRICE code must function slightly different than the VTY_PRICE indicator or perhaps the order of execution is slightly different.

I didn't try taking that OL code and introducing it and running it side by side the official indicator to prove this out -- maybe tomorrow. Right now all I can say is that the VTY_PRICE indicator seems to produce slightly different results for the Trade Ranking function than stripping down the function.
Deleting message 29924 : RE: ATM Micro States Method


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.