OmniTrader Professional Forum OmniTrader Professional Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Buffalo

Elite
500100
Posts: 603

Joined: 7/11/2007
Location: Braintree, MA

User Profile
 
Subject : RE: ATM Is Even Better Than I Thought
Posted : 2/28/2018 3:29 PM
Post #29898 - In reply to #29897

Mark

re: "Simply select 2X in the Simulation Settings and then double each of the individual Market State Percentage of Equity settings. This will keep all the statistics referenced to the $100,000 starting balance of the account, and also keep the % of Equity vs $$ available for trading at the same ratio.

Ex: if the original % of Equity was 10% for Bull, you now set it to 20%. (20% of $200,000 is still 10% of $$ available to trade)"

Not sure about this - doesn't 20% 0f $200k = $40k per trade NOT $20k? What am I missing? I know the tot # of trades stayed abt the same but that may be just coincidence based on the length of the backtest? the result may be exactly what you are shooting for - limit the trades to the best ones - but the risk/trade would go up substantially if it is $40 vs $10 (starting numbers, only gets bigger as acct grows)

**There is a quick way to test it - lets say you have 20%/trade set for bull. In Port Sim set the Bull timeframe dates as the test period, keep it at a year or so. Then look at the port sim statistics - in the middle under the position size area look at the avg size $ number. If the test period is only 1 year it will be around $20-25k or $40-50k and we'll have our answer. For long test periods this number skews way up obviously. I would but my OT is busy retraining dynamic, cluster NNs! Wish we could PAUSE training like SW to do other things then come back to it (Nirvana - hint, hint)

Also in ATM we need to be able to set a MAX trade size for our simulations - there is no way to even trade 10% per trade without massive slippage and effecting the symbol price (hurting your entry price) before getting fully filled on an acct over approx $500k when you're a retail investor. The other option, once your acct grows to those levels, is splitting up your acct over several IB accts and running OT/OV multiple times concurrently. But those are rich folk problems I **hope** we need to address later on

BUT I LOVE THE IDEA and hope we can make it work whatever the solution is. You may have nailed it, but Iam not sure so I am asking.

[Edited by Buffalo on 2/28/2018 4:09 PM]

Deleting message 29898 : RE: ATM Is Even Better Than I Thought


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.