jpb Veteran   Posts: 168 Joined: 5/11/2005 Location: Brown Deer, WI  User Profile | Jim, Interesting questions. I made a few additional runs. Restarted the OS and OT. Test run 1: Immediately after OT started, I ran the strategy. The Profile was the same one as before and OT opened to it. Result: The performance report was the same as the Baseline run, meaning the override to the OL Stop defaults did not take effect. Test run 2: Repeated the run of the strategy without restarting OT or any other change. Simply reran the strategy. Result: Matched the Baseline results as in Test run 1. Test run 3: Switched Profiles to a different one and then immediately switched back. Result: The performance report matched the results of my original Run2. This means that the overrides to the defaults found in the Strategy's TP were now taking effect. The automated recompile with the change of Profiles must accomplish the same thing as a OL Build that recompiles all the OL scripts. Test run 4: Immediately reran the strategy following the completion of Test run 3. Result: The performance report matched that of Test run 3. This leads me to suspect that it is the compiling of the scripts at the start of OT that is ignoring the settings in the Strategy's TP or the timing of the compile vs the loading of all the override data. My guess. For completeness, I also ran: Test Run 5: Staying within the same Profile, I deactivated the strategy and selected a new strategy. I then clicked OK. Next I went back into the ToDo list and changed the strategy back to the original one, deactivating the one I had just activated. I then ran the test. Result: Same as Test Run 4. (as you would expect). Test Run 6: Change the setting in the Strategy's Trade Plan by going into the Strategy and applying a change to the OL Stop. I then Ran the test. Result: A new result was created as seen in the performance report. Test Run 7: Reran the strategy, forcing analysis of all symbols. Result: Same performance values as Test Run 6. Test Run 8: Switched the profile to another profile and then back. Running the ToDo, forcing analysis for all symbols. Result: Same as Test Run 6. [Edited by jpb on 9/19/2018 3:04 PM] | |
